Unstoppable Learning

Unstoppable Learning

Share this post

Unstoppable Learning
Unstoppable Learning
Concrete Example - Teaching Integration

Concrete Example - Teaching Integration

How have other teachers applied the Unstoppable Learning system to teaching A Level integration, and how and why did it go wrong?

Kristopher Boulton's avatar
Kristopher Boulton
Jun 16, 2025
∙ Paid
4

Share this post

Unstoppable Learning
Unstoppable Learning
Concrete Example - Teaching Integration
1
Share
1×
0:00
-6:26
Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade.

Podcast is AI generated, and will make mistakes. Interactive transcript available in the podcast post.


How to design the instructional sequence for a transformation is explained here:

How to Teach Element 2 of 4: Transformations

How to Teach Element 2 of 4: Transformations

Kristopher Boulton
·
Jun 2
Read full story

And the initial testing sequence is explained here:

The Initial Testing Sequence

The Initial Testing Sequence

Kristopher Boulton
·
Jun 6
Read full story

In this post we’ll look at a concrete example of creating a transformation sequence for A Level integration, offered by Sianna Clarke, Head of Maths at Ilfracombe Academy, part of the Athena Learning Trust.

The sequence Sianna designed looked something like this:

It has minimal difference from one example to the next, ‘just change one thing.’

In theory it should work well. In practice, it didn’t; and at the request of her very bright A Level students, Sianna chose to return to how she would have taught it previously - start with a trinomial quadratic and just tell them to add one to the power, divide by the new power.

It’s how I learnt it at school, it usually works well for this very simple concept, and indeed it worked perfectly well here as well.

So:

  1. Why did the transformation sequence fail?

  2. And does it have anything to offer over a more traditional approach, given that that worked well enough?

When we dug into it together, we found three reasons - in hindsight - it predictably failed; and while the traditional approach worked well enough, the transformation sequence might yet have a little something extra to offer.

Those three reasons related to:

  1. The specific choice of examples

  2. The progression of examples

  3. The presentation of examples

They’re also connected to I do / We do, so if you missed this one, it might be worth a quick skim:

I do / We do Atomisation

I do / We do Atomisation

Kristopher Boulton
·
Jun 13
Read full story

When you recommend Unstoppable Learning and three people subscribe, even for free, you get free access to paid content

Share

(1) Choice of Examples

First, the specific choice of examples.

As a rule of thumb, 0, 1 and 2 are special cases. 0 is the identity of addition. 1 is the identity of multiplication. 2 defines the even numbers.

0 and 1 are also often present covertly, like: this:

\(x+5\)

Instead of this:

\(1x^1+5x^0\)

Resulting in secrets we fail to reveal to our students.

Overtisation - Reveal the Secrets

Overtisation - Reveal the Secrets

Kristopher Boulton
·
May 16
Read full story

So, I might have chosen initial examples like these instead:

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Unstoppable Learning to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Kristopher Boulton
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share